![]() What should we do each person work on there own branch? Merge the changes back to the trunk when they are done?Įventually, maybe. Introduce tickets/milestones etc when they are comfortable with the toolset itself, and be prepared to never use these if they don't get/need it.Ĥ. So, at first, use trac as a view of the svn timeline and a convenient diffing tool. But, it also has tickets, milestones, revision, priorities and a heap of other confusing tools that might baffle your developers. Initially, TRAC will allow your developers to see what is going on. ![]() I am also trying to get Trac working for our group. Just like software, defining team process needs a "plan" and good communication.ģ. The last thing you want to do is to give the perception that you prefer process over "real work" so keep moving and think evolution here, not revolution. Right now our environment, is not organized as it should be.Ī good configuration manager will always think this. Be prepared to redefine you long term goals as the team learns!Ģ. This means you need to split your personal configuration goals into short and long term goals. The next version of GitHub Enterprise Server to ship after January 8, 2024, will also remove Subversion support.If the team is new to configuration management, your short term goal should be to let them work in a controlled manner with MINIMAL interference to their work. Late in 2023, we’ll run a few hours-long and then day-long brownouts to help flush out any remaining use of the feature. After that date, it will be turned off and removed. We will maintain Subversion support until Januon. I have good news: with sparse checkout, sparse index, and partial clone, Git can now do a pretty decent job at these workflows. The main thing we heard when speaking with customers and communities was checking out a subset of the repository–a single directory, or only the latest commit. Why do people still use Subversion on GitHub, anyhow? Besides simple inertia, there were workflows which Git didn’t support until recently. As the use of GitHub has evolved and the number of Subversion requests has declined dramatically, we plan to focus our efforts entirely on Git. It’s clear that Subversion support is no longer helping people migrate to Git.īut hey, if the Subversion system just works and doesn’t bother anyone, there’s no reason to make any changes, right? The reality is that there’s an ongoing maintenance cost to any software, and that goes extra for public-facing services on the internet. Our traffic numbers inside GitHub back this up: fewer than 0.02% of requests made to the Git backend come through a Subversion endpoint, and only about 5,000 repositories see even a single Subversion request each month. Git enjoys up to 94% usage by developers, and Subversion is a lot rarer in the wild than it used to be. By natively supporting Subversion on top of a Git backend, GitHub made it easier for customers to move to Git while changing their workflows over in a gradual way.įast forward to now, and wow, have things changed. At that point in time, it was not yet clear that distributed version control would eventually take over, and even less clear that Git would be the dominant system. Subversion was already 10 years old and in good company with other centralized systems, while Git was still a relative newcomer. Many customers were using centralized version control systems. ![]() In 2010, when GitHub introduced Subversion support, the version control landscape was very different. A release of GitHub Enterprise Server sometime in early 2024 will also remove Subversion support. Hello from Git Systems, the team that works on the Subversion subsystem at GitHub.Īs of Janu(about a year from now), we will sunset Subversion support completely on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |